As required by law, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services will deny immigration petitions and applications for adjustment of status where there is evidence of fraud involved. Last week, we detailed the immigration consequences that may occur where Registered Nurses (RNs) enter the U.S. to work as an RN, but either never worked for their employer or only worked for a short period of time.
Such immigrants, sometimes through no fault of their own, may be accused of fraud and are exposed to possible Green Card revocation. Sometimes, immigration officers obtain derogatory information through a notification by the sponsoring employer or based on information developed during an applicant’s Naturalization interview.
Most marriages based on alleged fraud are denied at the interview stage and the applicant is placed in deportation proceedings while some marriages are not challenged until the naturalization interview.
Marriage-Based Green Card interviews may result in findings of fraud by immigration officers. In Marriage-Based Green Card interviews, which are conducted in USCIS District and Field Offices, Adjudications Officers set out to determine whether the applicant’s marriage to a U.S. Citizen is a legitimate one.
A legitimate marriage is a marriage that was not entered into for the purpose of evading immigration law. USCIS is required to focus on whether, at the time the marriage was entered into, the bride and groom intended to establish a life together.
In order to make a determination that a marriage is legitimate for immigration purposes, the examining officer looks into the conduct of the parties after the marriage to prove their intent at the time of its inception.
Relevant factors, which may be addressed at the interview, include whether the couple is living together, whether they jointly own property, and whether they are conducting themselves as husband and wife. Officers look for visual clues such as body language and whether a wedding ring is worn.
When USCIS has evidence that the marriage is not a legitimate one, officers will deny the marriage-based petition and the application for adjustment of status. If a person is charged with entering into a marriage solely for the purpose of evading immigration laws he will be barred under Section 204(c) Immigration and Nationality Act as amended. A 204(c) finding has severe immigration consequences.
The recipient has almost no hope of obtaining permanent resident status in the United States. Once a denial order is issued every subsequent petition filed on the applicant’s behalf will be denied. This rule applies whether the latter petition is a family or employment-based petition. The only exception to this strict rule, as set forth in a 1993 Board of Immigration Appeals decision, is that a fraud determination does not bar the approval of a second petition based on the same marriage.
Prior to a 204(c) finding, USCIS will often summon the applicant and spouse for a second interview. This interview is also referred to as a “marriage fraud interview” or “Stokes interview”, named for the New York District Court case which established guidelines within that district for a subsequent interview in which legitimacy of the marriage is at issue. During the second interview, the couple will be separated then questioned individually as to the specifics of their marriage. A wide variety of questions should be anticipated, such as the details of the couple’s first date, questions about furniture in the home or how holidays have been celebrated by the couple in the past. The couple’s attorney will be present during each separate interview to ensure compliance with Federal Regulations and USCIS policy on the part of the officer and to assist the couple where appropriate.
In recent months adjudications officers are questioning not only the veracity of the current marriage, but also inquiring into past marriages of the couple. Such questions should particularly be anticipated where the petitioning spouse previously received their Lawful Permanent Resident status on the basis of a petition from a prior spouse.
USCIS examiners believe that prior marriages are fair game at the interview regarding their new marital petition. We do not believe that past marriages are a legitimate line of inquiry, but appear to be more of a witch hunt in an effort to establish ineligibility to become a permanent resident. There are, however, some exceptions which would allow this line of inquiry.
Prior to the preparation and submission of documents to the USCIS a thorough examination of all relevant information must be undertaken. Prior to attending any immigration interview, a preparatory session and review of relevant information must also undergo strict professional scrutiny. There are severe consequences for individuals charged with entering into a marriage to evade immigration laws.
Author's Note: The analysis and suggestions offered in this column do not create a lawyer-client relationship and are not a substitute for the individual legal research and personalized representation that is essential to every case.
Thank you and more power!
Reeves & Associates, a PLC
Unit 507 Tower One Ayala Triangle
6767 Ayala Ave., Makati City, Philippines 1226
Phone: (632) 759-6777
Facsimile: (632) 759-7888
Pasadena, CA Phone: (626) 795-6777
San Francisco, CA Phone: (415) 568-3777
Las Vegas, NV: (702) 227-9888